Quantcast The Quad
College Media Network

Bomb threat shuts down Main Hall

By Jeff J. Simon

Issue date: 11/19/07 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email

It took just two minutes for WCU Campus Police to respond to a bomb threat made against Main Hall at 6:59 p.m. on Tuesday, Nov. 13.

Director of Public Safety and Campus Police Chief Michael Bicking said his officers were on the scene at 7:01 p.m and called University administrators as well as other local police departments.

Fire alarms were set off and students were evacuated from the building. Many were relocated to Anderson Hall, but were told around 8 p.m. to go home after public safety officers chose to evacuate it along with Recitation Hall. Neither Anderson nor Recitation were implicated in the bomb threat or thought to be in danger. Bicking did not know why his officers shut the buildings down.

"We first heard it was an emergency evacuation, but then we were told it was a bomb threat," Rae Dunbar, a first-year student who was in class in Main Hall at the time of the evacuation said. "I don't think people got freaked out until they [public safety] taped off Main Hall."

West Whiteland Township and Tredyffrin Township Police Departments were among the responding units, and within one hour, at least five bomb-sniffing dogs were inside of Main Hall. The building was cleared by 9:40 p.m. and scheduled to reopen for Wednesday morning classes. Police did not find any explosives inside.

Bicking confirmed that the threat was made from an off-campus location and his department is working with a local police department as well as federal and state agencies to locate the suspected caller. The investigation is still on-going.

The e2campus system was not activated until 8:39 p.m. - one hour and 39 minutes after the threat was made, leaving many students wondering why they were not informed of the police activity earlier. The e2campus system is the newly instituted system that sends out text and e-mail messages to students that sign up for the free service.

Bicking said that prior to Nov. 13, his department did not consider bomb threats made to a single building or location a "priority one" occurrence. Priority one occurrences were considered situations that put the entire campus in danger, such as an active shooter.

After receiving complaints from students about the text message delay, Bicking said public safety now understands that students want to be notified of single location threats such as the bomb threat made on Nov. 13. He warned, however, that if students receive too many priority one alerts, they would begin to ignore them.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

Yikes

posted 8/29/08 @ 2:35 PM EST

I was Googling something else but I stumbled across this... I've been in a similar situation before and would be quite displeased if the security officers mishandled their communication like this. (Continued…)

Piter

posted 11/13/08 @ 3:57 PM EST

Me also. Previously, I had the same situation as this...it was pretty unpleasant and terrifying.
I totally agree with the idea that all bomb threats that are made to a single building or location must be considered a "priority one" situation. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

On a scale of 1-5, how safe to you feel on and around campus?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement